MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1628930331

Corporate Social Responsibility: Comparative Critiques

2010· book· en· W1628930331 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kartik Raman, Ronnie D. Lipschutz

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan eBooks · 2010
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate social responsibilitySocial responsibilityHuman rightsPolitical scienceBusinessPolitical economyLawSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strange Bedfellows? Critiquing Corporate Social Responsibility K.R.Raman Corporate Social Responsibility in the Era of Capitalist Globalization L.Sklair Corporate Social Responsibility and the Problem of Human Rights: Who is Protecting Whom? R.D.Lipschutz The Opportunities and Limits of Corporate Support for Voluntary Activity in Canada: Evidence from Voluntary Organizations P.Bowles & F.MacPhail Indigenous/NGO Alliances Confronting Corporate/State Alliances: The Case of Jabiluka Uranium Prospect K.Trebeck Romania ltd. - A Case Study of Irresponsible Conduct in Human Resources C.Crisan Extractive Industries and Stunted States: Conflict, Responsibility and Institutional Change in the Andes A.Bebbington From Corporate Accountability to Shared Responsibility: Dealing with Pollution in a Peruvian Smelter Town F.Li Beyond Bureaucracies? The Struggle for Self-Determination and Social Responsibility in the Argentine Worker-Run Companies A.Bryer Business for Peace, or Peace for Business? The Role of Corporate Peace Activism in the Rise and Fall of Sri Lanka's Peace Process R.Venugopal Commercial Microfinance in India: Loan Angels or Loan Sharks D.Ajit& K.R.Raman Corporate Social Responsibility, Local Livelihood and Human Rights: The Case of Coca Cola in India K.R.Raman Land Acquisition: Impossibility of Corporate Social Responsibility P.K.Basu Shifting Terrain of Ethical Trade: Corporate and Civil Society Engagement in South African Agriculture S.Barrientos & A.Kritzinger Corporate Social Responsibility and the Problem of Human Rights: Who is Protecting Whom R.D.Lipschutz Notes Bibliography Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.011
Science and technology studies0.0120.086
Scholarly communication0.0170.019
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0120.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan eBooksSame topicInnovation and Socioeconomic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207