A Giant Lymphangioma Circumscriptum on the Anterior Axilla: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lymphangioma is a rare benign proliferative lymphatic lesion that appears in chronic lymphedematous states in a variety of settings. Lymphangioma circumscriptum consists of clinically thin-walled, translucent vesicles appearing in groups most commonly located on the axilla, chest, mouth, and tongue. A 12-year-old male patient had been suffering from itching, pink-red colored, translucent vesicular lesions overlying the anterior axilla since birth. The lesions had slowly grown in size and number over the years. The patient had no history of trauma, or cellulites. The physical examination revealed clusters of pink-red colored vesicles, which released a clear exudate when punctured. The lesion was 50×120 mm in size. The lesion was totally excised and repaired with Z-plasty. Histopathological examination revealed slight epidermal acanthosis and enlarged lymph in the upper dermis, impinging directly onto the epidermis. These lymphatics were lined only by endothelium. The lower dermis and sub-cutis contained abnormally large muscle-coated vessels containing a proteinaceous fluid. Six months later, there was no recurrence and a cosmetically and functionally acceptable postoperative result was obtained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".