The effects of alcohol and sedative hypnotic-anxolytic drugs intoxication on marital consent: a case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La cause en declaration de nullite decrite ici presente plusieurs aspects interessants quoique complexes. Le demandeur affirme qu'il avait consomme une quantite d'alcool demesuree avant la celebration de son mariage ainsi que barbituriques, et qu'il etait donc dans un etat d'intoxication au moment de l'echange des consentements qui avait considerablement diminue ses facultes intellectuelles et volitives. L'A. resume ici les faits entourant les quatre sentences et deux decrets qui furent prononces au cours des douze annees que dura l'etude de la cause. L'article est utile pour approfondir la procedure dans le cas de multiples appels a des instances superieures, les conditions entourant un nouvel appel dans un cause tenue pour jugee, la necessite de recourir a un expert dans des causes ou il existe un probleme psychique complexe et, surtout, pour expliquer les divers degres d'intoxication et l'interaction entre l'alcool et les barbituriques. Les opinions de plusieurs experts fournissent des renseignements medicaux pratiques sur l'intoxication et ses effets sur la capacite intellectuelle et volitive. Plusieurs elements de jurisprudence rotale sont developpes par l'A. relativement aux chefs d'incapacite contractuelle du a un usage insuffisant de la raison et un grave defaut de discernement. Une explication importante est egalement repetee ici quant a l'incompatibilite du chef de defaut de discernement et celui d'exclusion d'un ou de plusieurs elements essentiels du mariage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".