MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1629966455 · doi:10.32316/hse/rhe.v16i1.446

Jocelyne Murray. Apprendre à lire et à compter. École etsociété en Mauricie 1850-1900. Sillery: Septentrion, Collection« Éducation. Cahiers des Amériques 2 », 2003, 281 p.Bibliographie, index.

2004· article· fr· W1629966455 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Micheline Dumont

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Education Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au congrès de 1990 de la Canadian History of Education Association / Association canadienne d'histoire de l'éducation, à Ottawa, en compagnie de ma collègue Nadia Fahmy-Eid, nous avions intitulé un bilan des recherches en histoire de l'éducation au Québec : « La pointe de l'iceberg », laissant entendre que les recherches étaient encore trop peu nombreuses.Depuis cette date, les publications se sont multipliées et ma foi, l'iceberg est devenu une large banquise.L'ouvrage que vient de publier Jocelyne Murray s'ajoute donc à une longue litanie d'ouvrages dont plusieurs concernent le développement de l'éducation au XIX e siècle, ouvrages signés par

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.021
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicHistorical Education Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207