MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1630368212 · doi:10.1063/1.481574

Surface aligned photochemistry: Photodissociation of Cl2 and Cl2⋯Cl adsorbed on LiF(001)

2000· article· en· W1630368212 on OpenAlexaff
Javier B. Giorgi, Fedor Y. Naumkin, J. C. Polanyi, Sergei A. Raspopov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodissociationChemistryAtomic physicsIonizationPhoton energyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhotochemistryPhotonIonPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photodissociation of chlorine adsorbed on a LiF(001) surface at 25–70 K has been investigated by means of angularly resolved resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization spectroscopy (REMPI). The translational-energy distributions and angular distributions for forming Cl(g) photofragments were determined. Photolysis was performed employing 351 nm radiation, with laser pulse energies of 0.3–1.2 mJ/cm2. A peak in the translational energy of Cl(g) at about 0.4 eV was identified as being due to the direct photodissociation of the Cl2(ad) molecule by 3.5 eV photons. Particular interest attached to the observation of a further channel (termed “A”) for photodissociation leading to Cl(g) with translational energy peaking at ∼1 eV and extending to 1.5 eV. The available photon energy renders it highly unlikely that this “high-energy” Cl(g) originates in Cl2(ad). Channel A had the same linear dependence of Cl-atom flux on laser pulse-energy as did the lower energy (0.4 eV) channel, termed “B,” but differed from it in exhibiting a slow approach to steady state. It appears that channel A requires the prior build-up of Cl(ad) concentration due to the photodissociation of Cl2. It is proposed that this leads to the formation of a steady-state concentration of Cl2⋯Cl which when photolyzed yields high-energy Cl(g) via channel A. Channel A exhibits a distinctive angular distribution at low coverage and a characteristic Cl*/Cl ratio, as compared with channel B. The suggested mechanism for channel A is Cl2⋯Cl+hν→Cl3*→Cl2•Cl→Cl2+Cl (where* is an electronically excited state and • represents repulsion in the lower electronic state to which Cl3* reverts). This mechanism is interpreted in terms of an extensive diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) model for the trichlorine radical, shown to be in agreement with high level ab initio multireference internally contracted configuration interaction (MRCI) calculations, and consistent with the observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207