The Miocene to recent tectonic evolution of an active transform fault at the junction of Hellenic and Cyrpus arcs, Eastern Mediterranean: the linkage between the western Antalya Basin, Finike Basin and Anaximander Mountains.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interpretation of 3,500 km of high-resolution seismic reflection profiles \nrevealed that the tectonic evolution of the Finike Basin and its immediate surroundings \ninvolves three phases of deformation since the Miocene. A protracted contractional phase \ndominated by southwest-northeast trending fold-thrust structures ocurred during the \nEarly-Middle Miocene. This phase culminated during the Messinian, and was replaced \nby an interval of relative tectonic quiescence. The transition from the latest Miocene to \nPliocene-Quaternary was marked by a reactivated tectonism. This phase was dominated \nby partitioned strain, including: (i) reactivation and northwest-southeast directed \ncontraction in the Finike Basin extending into the southern Turkish continental margin, \n(ii) extension and transtension along the westernmost Antalya Basin and the adjacent \ncontinental margin, and (iii) contraction and transpression across the The Sırrı Erinç \nPlateau and the northern slopes of the Anaxagoras Mountain. \nA tectonic model is proposed where the development of these diverse \ntectonic regions can be explained by the development and temporal evolution of the intracontinental \nBeydağları Block, which experienced a 20º counterclockwise rotation during \nthe Late Miocene and earliest Pliocene. Here it is proposed that the western and eastern \nboundaries of the block are delineated by the Burdur-Fethiye Fault Zone and the dextral \nAntalya Fault, whereas the southern boundary is defined by the northern margin of the \nSirri Erinc Plateau and/or the southern margin of the Anaximenes and Anaxagoras \nMountains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".