MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1632285466 · doi:10.22323/1.139.0137

Decay of the rho and a1 mesons on the lattice using distillation

2012· preprint· en· W1632285466 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sasa Prelovsek, C.B. Lang, Daniel Mohler, Matija Vidmar

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of XXIX International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(Lattice 2011) · 2012
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
KeywordsPhysicsMesonPionParticle physicsQuarkPiResonance (particle physics)ScatteringWave functionNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extract the P-wave phase shift for five values of pion relative momenta, which gives information on the resonance.The Breit-Wigner formula describes the phase shift dependence nicely and we extract m = 792(7)(8) MeV and the coupling g = 5.13(20) at our m = 266 MeV.We extract the P-wave scattering length a l=1 = 0.082(10)(3) fm 3 from the state with the lowest pion relative momenta.We also determine the S-wave phase shift for two values of relative momenta, which provides parameters of the lowest axial resonance a 1 (1260).Using the Breit-Wigner fit we extract m a1 = 1.44(4)GeV and the coupling g a 1 = 1.1(3)GeV.From the lowest state we also extract the scattering length a l=0 = 0.23(12) fm for our m .The simulation is performed using one N f = 2 ensemble of gauge configurations with cloverimproved Wilson quarks.The phase shifts are determined from the lowest two energy-levels, which are obtained by the variational analysis with a number of quark-antiquark and mesonmeson interpolators.The correlation functions are calculated using the distillation method with the Laplacian Heaviside (LapH) smearing of quarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of XXIX International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(Lattice 2011)Same topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207