VH Gene Replacement in Thymocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quasi-monoclonal (QM) mouse has a functionally rearranged H chain gene inserted into its natural position in the IgH locus. In this position, the H chain gene is subject to many of the same activities as normally arranged H chain genes, including somatic hypermutation, V(H) gene replacement, and class switch recombination. Here, we have used this mouse strain to determine some of the rules that govern the V(D)J recombination activity of the IgH locus in thymus. We focused on the requirements for V(H) gene replacement. In normal mice, thymic DJ(H) rearrangements are common, but VDJ(H) rearrangements are not. We found intermediate products of V(H) replacement in double-positive CD4(+)CD8(+) cells of the QM thymus, demonstrating that the inserted V(H) gene was accessible and ruling out the possibility that a V(H) gene per se cannot be rearranged in the thymus. We found transcripts from the knocked-in H chain gene of QM, but no mu H chain protein was detectable in thymocytes. Cloning and sequencing of these transcripts revealed that some had been generated by V(H) gene replacement. Corresponding signal joints could also be identified. These results suggest that neither a B cell-specific signal nor an Ig protein are necessary to activate V(H)-to-VDJ(H) joining in thymocytes. Possible mechanisms remaining to account for overcoming the barrier to V(H) joining in thymocytes include the insertion of a transcriptionally active gene segment and/or the inactivation of a silencer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".