MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1633038737

Performances de reproduction des vaches laitières natives et importées dans la région du Tadla (Maroc)

2011· article· fr· W1633038737 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. Haddada, Bénédicte Grimard, A. El Aloui Hachimi, J. Najdi, H. Lakhdissi, Andrew A. A. Ponter, J.P. Mialot

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue marocaine des sciences agronomiques et vétérinaires/Revue Marocaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Vétérinaires · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyForestryGeographyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parmi les performances de reproduction des vaches laitieres dans la region du Tadla (Maroc) sur une periode de 4 annees, l’âge a la premiere insemination artificielle (IA) a ete de 573,4 ± 35,6 jours et a l’âge au premier velage de 853,8 ± 103,5 jours, l’intervalle velage-1ere IA de 75,5 ± 35,6 jours. Celui-ci a ete plus court chez les femelles importees que chez les natives. La race Montbeliarde a ete inseminee plus tot que la race Prim’Holstein. Le taux de reussite en 1ere IA a ete de 53,2% avec de larges variations inter-annuelles et inter-elevages. Les Prim’holstein ont ete mieux fecondees que les autres races. 18,2% des vaches ont necessite 3 IA ou plus et l’indice coital a ete de 1,8 ±1,3. La campagne, l’elevage et la race ont affecte significativement le taux de femelles ayant necessite 3 IA ou plus. La race Prim’holstein francaise a manifeste un taux inferieur a celui de la race Prim’holstein canadienne. L’intervalle velage - insemination fecondante a ete de 119,2 ± 83,8 jours. Ce parametre a varie tres significativement selon l’annee, l’elevage, la race et le numero de lactation. La race Montbeliarde a presente undelai moyen de fecondation plus court que la race Prim’Holstein Canadienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue marocaine des sciences agronomiques et vétérinaires/Revue Marocaine des Sciences Agronomiques et VétérinairesSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207