MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1636166896 · doi:10.1109/apnoms.2015.7275422

A simple real-time handover management in the mobile satellite communication networks

2015· article· en· W1636166896 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaofeng Wu, Guyu Hu, Younes Seyedi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHandoverSatelliteComputer scienceCommunications satelliteComputer networkReal-time computingGlobal Positioning SystemSimple (philosophy)Service (business)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks are capable of providing global or regional mobile services for a large number of users. Since the user's service duration may be greater than the coverage time of a LEO satellite, the user may be handed over to another visible satellite to prevent interruption of the ongoing communication. On the other hand, a mobile user may be covered by more than one satellite at the instant of connection handover. When the user is about to be handed over to another satellite, the serving satellite minimizing the number of handovers would in general be the one that provides the largest service time which is not necessarily equal to the coverage time of the very satellite. In this paper, we propose a new handover algorithm which exploits both the Global Positioning System (GPS) infrastructure and satellite diversity to provide a simple and real-time handover management in LEO satellite networks. The proposed algorithm not only minimizes the expected number of satellite handover, but is also efficient and easy to be implemented in hand-held devices, thus facilitating the mobile users' access to the satellite networks. Numerical simulations performed for two typical mobile satellite networks, viz. Iridium and Globalstar, corroborate the advantages gained by the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207