Etiology of Central Precocious Puberty in Males: The Results of the Italian Study Group for Physiopathology of Puberty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We reviewed the hospital records of 45 boys, followed in 13 pediatric departments throughout Italy, who had undergone computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging for central precocious puberty (CPP). Twenty-seven patients (60%) had idiopathic CPP and 18 (40%) neurogenic CPP. A hamartoma of the tuber cinereum was found in six patients (33%). All patients with hypothalamic hamartoma had earlier onset of symptoms than patients with idiopathic CPP. Five patients (27%) were affected by type 1 neurofibromatosis, two had ependymoma and five patients had an intracranial anomaly. Basal LH and basal and peak LH/FSH ratio were greater, but not significantly, in boys with neurogenic CPP than in boys with idiopathic CPP. The highest LH peak levels were observed in patients with hamartoma; however, no correlation was observed between LH peak and the size of the hamartomas. In addition, bone age at diagnosis was more advanced in patients with hamartoma than in patients with other conditions. In conclusion, gonadotrophin-dependent precocious puberty may be of idiopathic origin or may occur in association with any CNS disorder. Further studies are needed in order to evaluate the effects of nutritional, environmental and psychosocial factors on the timing of sexual maturation, to explain the high incidence of idiopathic CPP in our male patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it