MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1638627967 · doi:10.1029/2006rs003540

Precipitation measurements using VHF wind profiler radars: Measuring rainfall and vertical air velocities using only observations with a VHF radar

2007· article· en· W1638627967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMcGill University
FundersDivision of Ocean SciencesMcGill University
KeywordsRadarRemote sensingDoppler effectWind profilerQuantitative precipitation estimationEnvironmental scienceWeather radarDoppler radarSIGNAL (programming language)PrecipitationMeteorologyGeologyPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to a proper radar calibration, quantitative estimation of precipitation from radars also requires the extraction of the precipitation signal out of the Doppler spectra. It also requires the proper conversion of this precipitation signal into reflectivity factor. This study shows how the measurement of rainfall and vertical air velocities can be performed using only observations from a radar operating at the VHF band (i.e., meter wavelengths). We verify the assumption that the dielectric factor ∣K∣ 2 = 0.93 is valid for rain observations in the VHF band. We then derive, analytically and numerically, a more general version of the radar equation valid for vertically pointing radars with targets within a few kilometers range but still within the antenna far‐field region. Following this, we describe a new algorithm for extraction of rain signal out of VHF Doppler spectra. To validate our methods, we made colocated measurements of VHF Doppler spectra aloft and raindrop sizes at the ground. The analytical version of our radar equation compares well with similar equations available in current literature, and this validates the particular case of our numerically derived radar equation. We combine our numerical version of the radar equation and our algorithm for extracting precipitation signal. This combination allows us to obtain reflectivity factors (from rain signals) and vertical velocities (from air signals), these being simultaneous observations within the same sampling volume. From the data set collected, we found good agreement (linear correlation coefficient around 0.8) between the rain signals derived from VHF observations aloft and from drop sizes at ground level. Hence we are able to measure rainfall amounts and vertical air velocities in a simpler and more efficient way, using only observations from a VHF wind profiler. This represents a promising step toward the analysis of precipitation from large sets of radar data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it