Mechanism and functional role of XIAP and Mcl-1 down-regulation in flavopiridol/vorinostat antileukemic interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanism and functional significance of XIAP and Mcl-1 down-regulation in human leukemia cells exposed to the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol was investigated. Combined exposure of U937 leukemia cells to marginally toxic concentrations of vorinostat and flavopiridol resulted in a marked increase in mitochondrial damage and apoptosis accompanied by pronounced reductions in XIAP and Mcl-1 mRNA and protein. Down-regulation of Mcl-1 and XIAP expression by vorinostat/flavopiridol was associated with enhanced inhibition of phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II and was amplified by caspase-mediated protein degradation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that XIAP and Mcl-1 down-regulation were also accompanied by both decreased association of nuclear factor-kappaB (XIAP) and increased E2F1 association (Mcl-1) with their promoter regions, respectively. Ectopic expression of Mcl-1 but not XIAP partially protected cells from flavopiridol/vorinostat-mediated mitochondrial injury at 48 h, but both did not significantly restored clonogenic potential. Flavopiridol/vorinostat-mediated transcriptional repression of XIAP, Mcl-1-enhanced apoptosis, and loss of clonogenic potential also occurred in primary acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) blasts. Together, these findings indicate that transcriptional repression of XIAP and Mcl-1 by flavopiridol/vorinostat contributes functionally to apoptosis induction at early exposure intervals and raise the possibility that expression levels may be a useful surrogate marker for activity in current trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".