Local Food on a Global Scale: An Exploration of the International Slow Food Movement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Academic research on the Slow Food movement has tended to focus on Western developed nations. Italy, in particular, has received the majority of attention as the birthplace of the official movement. However, the Slow Food movement has become a global phenomenon with local groups and projects on every continent. This article explores the global structure of the Slow Food movement and the similarities and differences between movements in developed and developing nations. It offers an in-depth comparative analysis of the slow food movements in Kenya and Alberta, Canada, analysing the nature of local projects and the economic and cultural contexts in which they developed. The analysis illustrates the close intersection of culture, identity and economy within the Slow Food movement. It also highlights the need to understand the movement not only as a “politics of consumption” – which the focus on Western nations promotes – but also as a “politics of production.” The global Slow Food movement encompasses the entire food system, from soil to table, as well as the cultural meanings and identities derived from all stages in the food process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it