Liver functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis using a latent variables approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The liver is a highly vascular organ with a dual blood supply, and it performs a remarkable number of vital functions. Here, we show, through measurement of blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) signal, that liver arterial and hepatic portal blood supplies can be modulated through hyperoxia exposure and by consumption of a standardized meal, respectively. As such, we suggest that hyperoxia modulates the hepatic arterial BOLD signal, whereas a controlled meal changes predominantly the hepatic portal BOLD signal. The hemodynamics of the dual liver blood supplies in response to the aforementioned challenges are complex and variable across subjects, making a general linear model‐based analysis difficult. Therefore, we present the application of two local (at each voxel) hemodynamic response‐independent techniques—principal component analysis and partial least squares—to observe the hypothesized reduction in BOLD contrast during cycles of hyperoxic breathing, when comparing preprandial versus postprandial states in a normally functioning liver. We illustrate the ability of our techniques to differentiate between healthy and diseased livers with an analysis of 17 subjects—11 with normal livers and 6 with liver disease (hepatitis or cirrhosis). Our local analysis can correctly classify all of the subjects. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".