Accurate long-range coefficients for two excited like isotope He atoms:<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.2em"/><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.2em"/><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>,<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.2em"/><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.2em"/><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>, and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.2em"/><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.2em"/><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A general formalism is used to express the long-range potential energies in inverse powers of the separation distance between two like atomic or molecular systems with $P$ symmetries. The long-range molecular interaction coefficients are calculated for the molecular symmetries $\ensuremath{\Delta}$, $\ensuremath{\Pi}$, and $\ensuremath{\Sigma}$, arising from the following interactions: $\mathrm{He}(2\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{1}P)--\mathrm{He}(2\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{1}P)$, $\mathrm{He}(2\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{1}P)--\mathrm{He}(2\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{3}P)$, and $\mathrm{He}(2\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{3}P)--\mathrm{He}(2\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{3}P)$. The electric quadrupole-quadrupole term ${C}_{5}$, the van der Waals (dispersion) term ${C}_{6}$, and higher-order terms ${C}_{8}$ and ${C}_{10}$ are calculated ab initio using accurate variational wave functions in Hylleraas coordinates with finite nuclear mass effects. A comparison is made with previously published results where available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.012 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.021 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.025 | 0.024 |
| Research integrity | 0.023 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.571 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".