High resolution laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy of the [18.8]Φi3−XΦi3 (0,0) band of cobalt monofluoride
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fine and hyperfine interaction parameters in the [18.8] (3)Phi (upsilon=0) and X (3)Phi (upsilon=0) states of cobalt monofluoride, CoF, have been determined from an analysis of high-resolution laser induced fluorescence spectra of the [18.8] (3)Phi(3)-X (3)Phi(3) and [18.8] (3)Phi(4)-X (3)Phi(4) band systems. The previously reported pure rotational transitions of the X (3)Phi(4)(upsilon=0) state [T. Okabayashi and M. Tanimoto, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 221, 149 (2003)] were included in the data set. The hyperfine parameters for (59)Co (I=72) and (19)F (I=12) have been interpreted using atomic data together with a proposed molecular orbital description for the [18.8](3)Phi(i) and X (3)Phi(i) states. A comparison of the hyperfine parameters in the X (3)Phi state of cobalt monohydride, CoH, with those of the X (3)Phi state of CoF reveals that the bonding in the two molecules is significantly different. It is shown that, in a situation where the Omega substates of a multiplet degenerate electronic state are analyzed separately, the Fermi contact parameter b can be determined with fair accuracy from the apparent centrifugal distortion of the hyperfine structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".