Au-delà de la pensée binaire en traductologie : esquisse d’une analyse sociologique des positions traductives en traduction littéraire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En traductologie, les notions généralement admises, telles que « source » et « cible », « propre » et « étranger », « domestication » et « foreignization », « adequacy » et « acceptability » ont tendance à offrir de la traduction une image binaire. Cet article tente de penser la traduction au-delà du binarisme, en particulier du couple « interne/externe », en redéfinissant de façon succincte les notions d’habitus, de champ, de capital symbolique, d’homologie, d’illusio (Bourdieu) et de signifiance (Meschonnic) en sociologie de la traduction. La notion d’habitus est examinée à propos de Maurice-Edgar Coindreau et de Marcel Duhamel, et celle d’illusio est appliquée, conjointement avec celle de signifiance, aux traductions de The Grapes of Wrath (J. Steinbeck) par Karin de Hatker et Albert Debaty ainsi que de A Farewell to Arms (E. Hemingway) par Maurice-Edgar Coindreau. L’article conclut à l’utilité des notions héritées de Bourdieu et de Meschonnic pour penser la traduction en dehors du binarisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".