MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1647506036

The Archivist as Planner and Poet: Thoughts on the Larger Issues of Appraisal for Acquisition

2001· article· en· W1647506036 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchivistMeaning (existential)Function (biology)Session (web analytics)Public relationsEveryday lifeInterviewPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryPsychologyLibrary scienceLawBusinessComputer scienceAdvertising
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article traite de questions relies aux stratgies d'acquisition dans le domaine des documents privs.Il analyse les relations entre le processus d'acquisition et les mandats des institutions d'archives de mme que les notions d'importance.L'valuation y est lie aux concepts plus larges du temps, de la mmoire et de la conservation long terme des documents.Quatre grands secteurs de la recherche archivistique sont mis en vidence : le rle de l'valuation dans la conservation, la nature des documents personnels, les liens entre les archives et les autres objets de la mmoire sociale et, enfin, l'tude des utilisateurs des archives.L'auteure fait valoir que la recherche en histoire des archives doit se poursuivre car elle offre la possibilit de contribuer l'valuation archivistique et de l'humaniser.ABSTRACT This article comments on issues related to private sector acquisition strategies.It discusses the relationship of acquisition to institutional mandates and ideas of significance.Appraisal is linked to larger concepts of time, memory, and the continuing preservation of records.Four large areas for archives research are highlighted: the role of appraisal in preservation; the nature of records for private persons; connections between archives and other social memorials; and the study of archives users.The pursuit of archives history is advocated for its potential utilitarian and humane contributions to appraisal.Appraisal transforms the objects of its activities: some ordinary stuff of everyday transactions and communication are selected for special protection in an archives.Those not taken have an uncertain future: those selected will have a prolonged life.They will carry forward accruing burdens of meaning arising from their status as objects of continuing importance, to those who make the selection and to communities of users, some already established, others not yet known.Archivists who do appraisal recognize that it is an extraordinary function with wide ranging implications for society, but more particularly to their insti-* This paper was prepared from a commentary delivered in the session "Private Sector Acquisition Strategies" at the annual general meeting of the Association of Canadian Archivists in Winnipeg (2001).I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it