MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1650102470

Tradition and innovation: woodcarvers at the confluence of the Umzinyathi and Umngeni rivers, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

2001· article· en· W1650102470 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frank Jolles

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Rock Art Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZuluQuarter (Canadian coin)CarvingPoliticsMilkingHoardGentryWork (physics)Period (music)HistoryGeographyEthnologyAncient historyArchaeologyPolitical scienceLawArtEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is a review of a collection of 185 items now housed in the Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg. It consists of the principal wooden objects found in Zulu households: headrests, platters for serving meat, milking pails and spoons of various descriptions. The period covered is from the beginning of the twentieth century through to the 1990s - three generations of carvers. For each item, the owner was established and the item attributed as far as possible to its carver. Where feasible, the carvers or their descendants were interviewed, and their biographical background, opinions about their trade, assessment of their colleagues' work and other pertinent information were recorded. In spite of the limited area and the fact that many of the carvers knew of each other's work there was a surprising variation in styles of headrests and meat platters (but not milking pails). Within the array of styles the Umzinyathi River seemed to serve as a boundary, even though it is easily fordable. As a result it is possible to trace the formation of autonomous regional styles on each side of the river: for meat platters on the eastern, and for headrests on the western side. The information supplied by the owners and the carvers allows certain conclusions to be drawn about the political and social circumstances that brought about a florescence of traditional carving in the first three quarters of the twentieth century, before it entered its terminal decline in the final quarter. To cite this paper: Jolles, F. 2001. Tradition and innovation: woodcarvers at the confluence of the Umzinyathi and Umngeni rivers, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa . Southern African Humanities 13 : 97-124.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesFrench-language works237,207