MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1650105752 · doi:10.1029/2000wr000170

Two adjacent forested catchments: Dramatically different NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> export

2002· article· en· W1650105752 on OpenAlexaff
Sherry L. Schiff, K. J. Devito, Richard J. Elgood, P. M. McCrindle, John Spoelstra, Peter J. Dillon

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater tableGroundwaterSoil waterHydrology (agriculture)Drainage basinNitrateEnvironmental scienceDenitrificationNitrificationMineralization (soil science)DrainageBiogeochemical cycleGeologyNitrogenSoil scienceEnvironmental chemistryEcologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two adjacent catchments with similar temperate forest cover and podzolic soils have annual nitrate (NO 3 − ) export that differs by a factor of 10. Monthly rates of mineralization and nitrification measured by the buried bag technique, soil C/N ratios, and the contribution of microbial NO 3 − to total NO 3 − in the groundwater as determined by analysis of δ 18 O in NO 3 − are also similar. In both catchments, maximum NO 3 − export occurs during spring melt, but in the catchment with higher export, NO 3 − concentrations in the stream begin to increase in the fall period. Groundwater NO 3 − concentrations measured in wells are very different in the two catchments with high groundwater NO 3 − in the catchment exhibiting high NO 3 − export. Following spring melt, steeper slopes in the high NO 3 − catchment promote faster drainage, and the water table declines rapidly while high NO 3 − concentrations are maintained in groundwaters. Deeper water tables will preserve high NO 3 − in water infiltrating below the rooting zone and organic‐rich upper soil horizons. In the low NO 3 − catchment, slower drainage on shallower slopes lead to an increase in soil saturation, and the NO 3 − disappears from the water before the water table declines. Analyses of δ 15 N in NO 3 − during NO 3 − loss do not show evidence of denitrification, although denitrification proceeding to completion in isolated pockets followed by mixing with higher NO 3 − groundwaters would yield the same result. Alternatively, active uptake of NO 3 − by vegetation following spring melt will also deplete the groundwater NO 3 − in the shallow soil depths without isotopic fractionation. The low NO 3 − catchment also has lower NO 3 − in shallow soil waters during spring melt. Shallower slopes promote near‐surface flow paths in organic‐rich soil horizons which may facilitate denitrification during spring melt. Although the catchment with low NO 3 − export has a large wetland near the catchment outlet, the NO 3 − attenuating capacity of this wetland is largely unused except in the late fall because growing season groundwater concentrations of NO 3 − are undetectable and the wetland is frozen during snowmelt. In the high NO 3 − catchment, organic‐rich soils and vegetation in the riparian zone cannot completely attenuate high NO 3 − in discharging groundwaters. In our study, factors controlling NO 3 − in groundwater such as slope, stratigraphy, and hydraulic conductivity can play a larger role than riparian zones in controlling differences in annual NO 3 − export observed between catchments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207