MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W16509331 · doi:10.1021/es0516209

Solução espectral para modelos bidimensionais da equação linear de Boltzmann

2009· article· en· W16509331 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luciana Chimendes Cabrera

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiative Heat Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesMathematicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measured the relative importance of water and food as sources of the trace elements As, Cd, Co, Cu, Pb, and Zn for larvae of the benthic insect Sialis velata. To achieve this end, we first exposed its prey, the midge Chironomus riparius, to trace elements in a contaminated lake located near a nonferrous metal smelter in northwestern Quebec. Concentrations of five of the six trace elements reached a steady state in prey within one week. When predators were exposed to these contaminated prey, their trace element concentrations increased markedly for all of the trace elements studied. In contrast, exposure of S. velata to contaminated lake water led to no significant increase in their concentrations of five of the six trace elements ([Pb] increased only slightly). Additional treatments in which the predator was exposed to these trace elements in both food and water or in a combination of food and water and sediment did not lead to further increases in its contaminant concentrations beyond those measured in the food-only treatment. We conclude that food (prey) is the almost exclusive source of As, Cd, Co, Cu, and Zn for S. velata and that it is the source of 94% of its Pb. Model curves for trace element accumulation over time by the predator fit our measured data well, and trace element concentrations in food alone are sufficient to model the exchange of these contaminants in this insect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicRadiative Heat Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207