Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on capturing the semantics of data stored in databases with the goal of integrating data sources within a company, across a network, and even on the World-Wide Web. Our approach to capturing data semantics revolves around the definition of a standardized dictionary which provides terms for referencing and categorizing data. These standardized terms are then stored in semantic specifications called X-Specs which store metadata and semantic descriptions of the data. Using these semantic specifications, it becomes possible to integrate diverse data sources even though they were not originally designed to work together. The centralized version of the architecture is presented which allows for the independent integration of data source information (represented using X-Specs) into a unified view of the data. The architecture preserves full autonomy of the underlying databases which are transparently accessed by the user from a central portal. Distributing the architecture would by-pass the central portal and allow integration of web data sources to be performed by a user's browser. Such a system which achieves automatic integration of data sources would have a major impact on how the Web is used and delivered. Unlike wrapper or mediator systems which achieve data source integration by manually defining an integrated view, our architecture automatically constructs an integrated view from information independently provided by the data sources. Thus, the contribution is an algorithm for schema integration not just a methodology for accessing data sources whose knowledge has been precombined into mediated views. The integrated view is a hierarchy of concepts that is queried by semantic name. Thus, the system provides both logical and physical access transparency by mapping user queries on high-level concepts to physical schema elements in the underlying data sources. Notes: Joint released technical report. Released as TR-00-15 for the University of Manitoba, and 2000-662-14 for the University of Calgary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".