High-Performance Modelling for the Mesoscale Alpine Programme (MAP) Field Experiment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the development of a version of the Canadian non-hydrostatic MC2 model optimized for massively parallel processors, it has become possible to solve very large weather forecast problems in a time sufficiently short to envision a realtime daily calculation over a domain covering the entire Alps. MAP is a large multinational research program that will gather new knowledge about the heavy precipitation over steep topography; its field phase is to take place during Fall of 1999. The tentative grid dimensions are 490 − 400 − 35 at a horizontal resolution of 2 km, with possibly a need to increase the number of vertical layers. This is a very large problem to be solved with realtime constraints. The model results will be accessible to the forecasters at the MAP Operations Centre in Innsbruck, to assist in the scientific briefings to dispatch the flight plans of the research aircraft. The forecasts are planned to be performed on the NEC-SX/4 (10 PE) at the CSCS (Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico) in Manno (Canton Ticino, Switzerland), which is affiliated with the ETH. The current state of this joint effort is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".