MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1652762507 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.072010

Measurements of neutrino oscillation in appearance and disappearance channels by the T2K experiment with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mn>6.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>protons on target

2015· article· lv· W1652762507 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle PhysicsUniversity of AlbertaTRIUMFUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of TorontoYork UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Regina
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareCERNEuropean Research CouncilInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNarodowe Centrum NaukiDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronRoyal SocietyMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchEducation, Audiovisual and Culture Executive AgencyRussian Science FoundationMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCanada Foundation for InnovationCompute CanadaWestern Canada Research GridSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNeutrino oscillationNeutrinoPhysicsMuonParticle physicsConfidence intervalOscillation (cell signaling)Muon neutrinoNuclear physicsElectron neutrinoMathematicsNeutrino detectorStatisticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on measurements of neutrino oscillation using data from the T2K long-baseline neutrino experiment collected between 2010 and 2013. In an analysis of muon neutrino disappearance alone, we find the following estimates and 68% confidence intervals for the two possible mass hierarchies: $\text{normal hierarchy}:\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{23}=0.51{4}_{\ensuremath{-}0.056}^{+0.055}$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{32}^{2}=(2.51\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.10)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{2}/{c}^{4}$ and $\text{inverted hierarchy}:\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{23}=0.511\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.055$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{13}^{2}=(2.48\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.10)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{2}/{c}^{4}$. The analysis accounts for multinucleon mechanisms in neutrino interactions which were found to introduce negligible bias. We describe our first analyses that combine measurements of muon neutrino disappearance and electron neutrino appearance to estimate four oscillation parameters, $|\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}^{2}|$, ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{23}$, ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{13}$, ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{CP}$, and the mass hierarchy. Frequentist and Bayesian intervals are presented for combinations of these parameters, with and without including recent reactor measurements. At 90% confidence level and including reactor measurements, we exclude the region ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{CP}=[0.15,0.83]\ensuremath{\pi}$ for normal hierarchy and ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{CP}=[\ensuremath{-}0.08,1.09]\ensuremath{\pi}$ for inverted hierarchy. The T2K and reactor data weakly favor the normal hierarchy with a Bayes factor of 2.2. The most probable values and 68% one-dimensional credible intervals for the other oscillation parameters, when reactor data are included, are ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{23}=0.52{8}_{\ensuremath{-}0.038}^{+0.055}$ and $|\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{32}^{2}|=(2.51\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.11)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{2}/{c}^{4}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it