MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1653276851 · doi:10.1017/s002572730000781x

Shelley McKellar, Surgical limits: the life of Gordon Murray, University of Toronto Press, 2003, pp. x, 270, illus., £28.00, US$45.00 (hardback 0-8020-3739-9).

2004· article· en· W1653276851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher Lawrence

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical History · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAction (physics)Library scienceWorld Wide WebPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

it remains problematic for three main reasons.FirstÐas noted by So Èderqvist himselfÐmany factors influence the scientist's life.And in fact, Jerne's life is shaped not only by his inner motivations but also, for example, by social networks: relatives, friends, colleagues, and, last but not least, his wives and girlfriends.So Èderqvist describes all these factors and in fact he delivers a modern biography, which considers the cultural environment of the scientist.Therefore, I have some doubts whether the ``existential biography'' really serves as a new methodological approach.I think the consideration of the ``inner life'' of a person only complements the variety of aspects which should be considered in biographical writing.Second, the analysis is sometimes rather meagre, and the explanation of why the inner life shapes Jerne's scientific theories is sometimes vague and speculative and not entirely convincing.There is no careful conclusive analysis.Third, when focusing strongly on Jerne's personal motivations and ideas, there is danger in adhering too much to his own interpretation of his life.Jerne loved the existential philosopher Sùren Kierkegaard; So Èderqvist loves him too, and the outcome is an ``existential biography''.So Èderqvist explains the danger of a strong identification with the research subject, but the reader is left feeling uneasy.Notwithstanding these criticisms, this biography is an important contribution to the history of science and medicine.It is a good read, it is very inspiring andÐeven if this is not its primary intentionÐit tells us a lot about the history of immunology.The book is above all a reminder of the need for personal aspects of a researcher's life to be considered much more than hitherto, andÐusing a phrase of the historian Peter MorawÐthat the scientist does not leave his personality and social relations in the wardrobe when entering the lab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical HistorySame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207