MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1653566857 · doi:10.5858/2002-126-0540-mamoai

MYCC and MYCN Oncogene Amplification in Medulloblastoma

2002· article· en· W1653566857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedulloblastomaFluorescence in situ hybridizationIsochromosomeContext (archaeology)Gene duplicationBiologyPathologyIn situ hybridizationNeuroblastomaCancer researchOncologyMedicineGeneticsKaryotypeMessenger RNAGeneCell culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Context. —Brain tumors are the most common solid tumor in childhood, and medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in this age group. Cytogenetic abnormalities that have been described in childhood medulloblastoma include loss of 17p, amplification of MYCC (c- myc ), amplification of MYCN (N- myc ), and isochromosome 17q. Data on these tumors indicate that the frequency of MYCC amplification is 5% to 10%. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is a powerful tool for investigating these features on archival material. Objectives. —To determine if intratumoral heterogeneity exists for MYCC and MYCN in medulloblastomas and if tumors with amplified MYCC or MYCN exhibit consistent histologic patterns. Design. —In this fluorescence in situ hybridization study, we investigated the frequency and prognostic significance of MYCC and MYCN amplification in 77 medulloblastomas derived from the Children's Oncology Group. Results. — MYCC amplification occurred in only 4 (5.2%) of 77 tumors. The 4 patients died of clinically aggressive neoplasms within 7 months of diagnosis. Similarly, 4 of 77 patients' tumors were found to exhibit MYCN amplification, but survival data are incomplete at present, therefore prognostic significance cannot be characterized. Conclusions. —These data establish the frequency of MYCC amplification in a large cohort of children with medulloblastoma and further suggest that MYCC amplification may be a marker of poor prognosis. Intratumoral heterogeneity was identified for these oncogenes in that 1 patient's tumor exhibited evidence of both MYCN and MYCC amplification, and this patient experienced a shortened survival time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it