MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W165371892

Image Processing. A new Approach via Informational Entropy and Informational Divergence of non Random Functions

2015· article· en· W165371892 on OpenAlex
Guy Jumarie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStatistical Mechanics and Entropy
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrightnessEntropy (arrow of time)Artificial intelligenceImage processingPrinciple of maximum entropyMathematicsRényi entropyComputer scienceImage compressionConditional entropyInformation diagramPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionImage (mathematics)Binary entropy functionMaximum entropy thermodynamicsPhysicsOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By combining a maximum conditional entropy principle with a basic equation of (Shannon) information theory, one can obtain a meaningful concept of informational entropy of non random functions. When this entropy is applied to the brightness function of an image, one so has at hand a new tool which provides new approaches to some image processing problems, such as, for instance, image representation, image compression and image similarity. As a by-product, to some extent, this new modelling provides a support to the so-called monkey model of image entropy. But while the latter involves the brightness itself, here, the entropy of the brightness function is expressed in terms of the contrast of the brightness instead of the brightness itself. In this framework, a new concept of informational divergence of an image is obtained, which could be of help in image analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it