MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1653987417 · doi:10.1063/1.2750899

Proton Induced Coherent Pion Production

2007· article· en· W1653987417 on OpenAlexaff
K. Fujita, Y. Sakemi, S. Asaji, M. Dozono, K. Hatanaka, Eikichi Ihara, T. Kaneda, Hiroaki Matsubara, Hiroshi Okamura, Y. Shimizu, Y. Tameshige, A. Tamii, T. Wakasa

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPionPhysicsNuclear physicsNeutronProtonNucleonTime of flightRange (aeronautics)Particle physicsAerospace engineeringOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The short range component of the nucleon‐nucleus interaction is phenomenologically described by effective interaction including the so‐called Landau‐Migdal parameters g′, among which only gΔΔ′ has been left unfixed because of the scarcity of experimental information. We propose Coherent Pion Production (CPP) measurement 12C(p, nπ+)12C(g.s.) to get quantitative information on gΔΔ′. A preliminary CPP experiment was performed at the RCNP neutron time of flight facility by involving exclusive measurement of pions and neutrons. We have specially developed for this purpose a new pion counter and embedded it in the beam swinger magnet of the neutron time of flight facility. We describe the experiment and preliminary result from the pion‐neutron coincidences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207