Compte rendu d'une démarche d'évaluation d'un programme de formation québécois axé sur l' argumentation de l´employabilité de personnes immigrantes scolarisées.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo descreve o processo de avaliação de um programa de formação baseado na experimentação de uma estratégia de integração ao mercado de trabalho da cidade de Quebec, de pessoas imigrantes escolarisadas. A estratégia que nos propusemos para avaliar o projeto pi¬loto centrou-se primeiramente na pertinência do projeto tendo em vista as exigências do mercado de trabalho quebequense. Em segundo lugar na pertinência individual do projeto, aspecto relacionado ao desenvolvimento de competências julgadas importantes pelo público-alvo, referentes à sua própria inserção no mercado de trabalho e à sua auto-realização enquanto detentores de conhecimentos profissionais. Em terceiro lugar, baseamo-nos na pertinência pedagógica das intervenções e, finalmente, na pertinência estratégica do projeto, aspecto relacionado com a inserção profissional efetiva de seus participantes no mercado de trabalho da cidade de Quebec e com as possibilidades de transferência do modelo de formação a outros grupos de imigrantes.Résumé: Cet article décrit le processus d’évaluation d’un programme de formation axé sur l’expérimentation d’une démarche d’intégration au marché du travail de la ville de Québec, de personnes immigrantes scolarisées. La démarche que nous avons proposé pour évaluer le projet pilote s’est centrée premièrement sur la pertinence du projet vis-à-vis des exigences du marché du travail québécois. Deuxièmement, elle s’est basée sur la pertinence individuelle du projet, aspect lié au développement des compétences jugées importantes par la clientèle cible concernant sa propre insertion dans le marché du travail et son épanouissement en tant que détentrice de connaissances professionnelles. Troisièmement, elle s’est penchée sur la pertinence pédagogique des interventions et enfin sur la pertinence stratégique du projet, aspect lié à l’insertion professionnelle effective des participants au marché du travail de la région de Québec et la transférabilité du modèle de formation à d’autres clientèles immigrantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".