Photoinduced charge transfer reaction at surfaces. III. (HF)2⋯Nan/LiF(001)+hν(640 nm)→HFF−Nan+/LiF(001)+H(g)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A sub-monolayer of atomic sodium was deposited on a LiF(001) surface at 40 K. The adsorbed sodium exists at the surface as single atoms and clusters. The surface was dosed with 1 L of HF, to form adsorbed (HF)2...Na(n) (n=1,2,3,...) complexes, which were then irradiated by 640 nm laser light, to induce charge-transfer reaction. The reaction-product atomic H(g) was observed leaving the surface by two-color Rydberg-atom time-of-flight (TOF) spectroscopy. The TOF spectrum of the desorbed H atoms contained two components; a "fast" component with a maximum at approximately 0.85 eV, and a "slow" component with a maximum at 0.45 eV. These two components were attributed to photoreaction on adsorbed single atoms and clusters of sodium, respectively. The fast component exhibited a structure (48+/-17 meV spacing) near the high-energy end of spectrum. This structure was attributed to vibration of NaFHF photoproduct residing on the surface. The cross section of the harpooning event in the Na...(HF)2 adsorbed complex was determined as (9.1+/-2.0)x10(-19) cm(2). To interpret the experimental vibrational structure and the relative energies of the fast and slow components of the TOF spectrum, high-level ab initio calculations were performed for reactants Na(n)...(HF)(m) (n,m=1,2) and reaction products Na(n)F(m)H(m-1). The calculated NaF-HF and Na-Na(HF)(2) bond dissociation energies indicated that photoexcitation of the precursor complexes led not only to ejection of H atoms, but also to dissociation of the Na(n)...(HF)(2) (n=1,2) species through cleavage of the NaF-HF and Na-Na(HF)(2) bonds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".