MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1660591014 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2015.7285882

An improved harmonic contribution estimation using nonlinear optimization techniques

2015· article· en· W1660591014 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Sheikholeslamzadeh, Nicolas Wrathall, Stephen Cress, Alexander Hamlyn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsHydro One (Canada)Kinectrics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemMATLABHarmonicComputer scienceHarmonic analysisRange (aeronautics)SoftwareFocus (optics)VoltageElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringAcousticsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple distributed harmonic sources, such as inverter-interfaced distributed generation (DG), in distribution systems have posed new challenges in identifying the cause of harmonic voltages or currents observed at a specific location. This paper proposes a new method to estimate harmonic contribution using nonlinear optimization techniques. First, definitions are provided and the problems are described. Then, existing solutions found in the literature, with focus on the latest method (i.e. linear method), and the details of the proposed nonlinear method are presented. Finally, the linear and the nonlinear methods are simulated and evaluated using a sample 27.6 kV distribution feeder with two large PV generators in CYME and MATLAB software. Results show that while the linear method may be accurate in specific applications, the nonlinear method provides significantly higher accuracy in a broader range of applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207