Lack of cable pili expression by cblA-containing Burkholderia cepacia complex a aThe GenBank accession numbers for the complete cblA nucleotide sequences for the isolates listed in Table 1 are AF455151–AF455162.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Burkholderia cepacia complex consists of several closely related bacterial species (or genomovars) which although generally not pathogenic for healthy individuals, contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality among persons with cystic fibrosis (CF). Certain B. cepacia complex strains are more frequently recovered from CF sputum cultures than are others, and these typically reside in genomovar III. The ET12 clone is a genomovar III strain that predominates among CF patients in Canada and the United Kingdom and is characterized by distinctive cblA-encoded pili that have a cable-like morphology. In a previous survey of B. cepacia complex isolates recovered from 606 CF patients in the US, a single genomovar III ET12 isolate (isolate AU0007) was identified; several cblA-containing genomovar I isolates, however, were also detected. In the study reported here, analysis by PFGE revealed several distinct strain types among these genomovar I isolates, and sequence analysis of their cblA genes demonstrated 87.8-88.4% identity to the ET12 cblA sequence. Southern analysis indicated that the cblA variant from each genomovar I isolate resides on a 4 kbp EcoRI fragment, in contrast to ET12 isolates, in which cblA localizes to a 5 kbp EcoRI fragment. Western blot assay indicated expression of the 16 kDa major pilin subunit by ET12 isolates, including AU0007, but neither whole-cell nor surface-protein extracts of the genomovar I reacted. Electron microscopy revealed the complete absence of pili expression by the genomovar I isolates. In contrast to typical ET12 isolates, AU0007 appeared to be hyperpiliated with rigid pili that lacked the cable morphology and did not bind cytokeratin 13, which has been previously identified as the epithelial cell receptor for the ET12 cable-pili-associated adhesin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".