MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W16646916 · doi:10.2202/1548-923x.1133

Heat transfer measurements of a re-entry capsule using fast response thermocouples

2004· article· en· W16646916 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brody Roache

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermocoupleHeat transferThermopileMaterials scienceThermal conductionHeat fluxMechanicsAtmospheric entryAtmosphere (unit)Mechanical engineeringOpticsThermodynamicsAerospace engineeringEngineeringComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicting the heat transfer of a re-entry capsule as it enters the atmosphere is critical to\nthe capsule design. At hypersonic speeds, air temperature in front of a capsule entering\nthe Mars atmosphere is heated to about 1600C by friction between the capsule and the\ngas in the atmosphere. An accurate heat transfer prediction is essential to design the\nheat shield as light as possible so that the scientific payload can be increased.\nThis project aims to investigate the application of fast response thermocouples to the\nmeasurement of heat transfer in the hypersonic flow produced by the gun tunnel, and\nobtaining representative data on selected re-entry capsule geometries for comparison\nwith theory and other experiments.\nE-Type thermocouples are used to calculate temperature change by measuring the\nemf produced by the Seebeck effect. Heat transfer is calculated by assuming one-\ndimensional heat conduction.\nThis project demonstrates that E-type thermocouples can be designed and constructed\nto effectively measure temperature with a response fast enough to effectively calculate\nheat flux during a 20 millisecond gun tunnel run.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Nursing Education ScholarshipSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207