MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1665155436 · doi:10.1002/pssc.201084046

Optical properties and photo‐ and X‐ray luminescence of Sm<sup>3+</sup>‐doped chalcogenides

2011· article· en· W1665155436 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kouji Maeda, Ryutaro Tsudome, Masahiro Ido

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceLuminescencePhosphorDopingMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CeramicQuenching (fluorescence)Photoluminescence excitationMineralogyOpticsOptoelectronicsFluorescenceChemistryPhysicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report a new X‐ray scintillating phosphor material whose composition is based on Sm‐doped chalcogenides. These are partly crystallized glass ceramics prepared by melt quenching techniques. Optical characterization of the samples was carried out at room temperature. The photoluminescence emission spectra of Ga‐Ge‐S glasses (GGS) and Ba‐Ga‐Se (BGS) glasses and glass ceramics exited at 405 nm have been obtained. Photoluminescence emissions at 565, 600, and 650 nm bands were identified and attributed to transitions from 4G5/2 to 6H5/2,6H7/2, and 6H9/2 respectively in Sm3+. The PL intensity from BGS material is stronger than that from GGS glasses doped with Sm3+. The X‐ray luminescence (XL) could be detected from the BGS glass ceramic samples under an excitation from a Cu target X‐ray tube (40kV, 200 mA power). The red light XL was clearly visible in the dark (© 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207