Absolute cross sections for electron-impact excitation of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi/></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi/></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math>transitions in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The absolute cross sections for the ${3d}^{2}{}^{3}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{F}3d4p{}^{3}D,$ ${}^{3}F$ excitation of ${\mathrm{Ti}}^{2+}$ ions at electron energies close to threshold (9--10 eV) were measured using the merged electron-ion beams energy-loss technique. The value of the cross-section step for the sum of the 13 allowed transitions to ${}^{3}D$ and ${}^{3}F$ levels, separated in energy by less than $0.1 \mathrm{eV},$ is found to be $(0.84\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.18)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16} {\mathrm{cm}}^{2}.$ Results from a set of first-order distorted-wave calculations range from $0.53\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16} {\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$ to $1.63\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16} {\mathrm{cm}}^{2}.$
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.018 | 0.016 |
| Research integrity | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.938 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".