Pediatric urolithiasis: experience at a tertiary care pediatric hospital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics, evaluation and course of patients with urolithiasis at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario to improve current diagnostic and management strategies. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of children with newly identified urolithiasis between Jan. 1, 1999, and July 31, 2004. Cases were reviewed for demographics, presentation, family history, diagnostic methods and findings, metabolic and anatomic abnormalities, management, stone analysis and stone recurrence. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (40 male, 32 female; mean age 11.3 yr) were assessed. Mean follow-up was at 1.5 years. Eighteen patients (25%) had a family history of stones. Flank pain (63%) was the most common presentation. Eighty-two percent of urinalyses showed microscopic hematuria. Imaging comprised abdominal plain film radiography (56%) and (or) abdominal ultrasonography (74%). The mean stone size was 5 mm. Forty-one percent (28/69) of patients who underwent metabolic investigation had an abnormality. Fourteen percent of patients (10/72) had a genitourinary anatomical abnormality. Thirty-four patients (47%) passed their stones spontaneously, 25 patients (35%) required surgical intervention and 13 patients (18%) had yet to pass their stone. The mean size of spontaneously passed stones was 4 mm. Of 42 stones analyzed, 39 (93%) were composed of calcium oxalate or phosphate. Seventeen (24%) patients had stone recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients with stones present in a manner similar to adults. Abdominal plain film radiography and ultrasonography are the preferred initial radiological investigations in children as they limit radiation exposure. Metabolic abnormalities are common and may coexist with anatomic abnormalities, therefore investigations must rule these out. One-half of patients will pass their stones spontaneously. Recurrence rates are high and long-term follow-up is recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".