MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1670532357 · doi:10.25011/cim.v30i3.1727

Is Prolonged and Repeated Exercise-Induced Myocardial Ischemic Training Deleterious?

2007· article· en· W1670532357 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Martin Noël, Jean Jobin, Audrey Marcoux, L Boyer, Gilles R. Dagenais, Peter Bogaty

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyAmbulatoryHeart rateTroponin complexIschemiaTroponinMyocardial infarctionBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD), the current guidelines on exercise prescription recommend that exercise training intensity be 10 beats/min below the heart rate at which there is >1 mm ST-segment depression (ischemic threshold). However, it is not well established that exercise training above the ischemic threshold is harmful. 
 
 Methods: Twenty-two patients with angiographically documented IHD (>70% stenosis) were randomized to exercise training either at a target intensity that induced myocardial ischemia (ischemic group) or that adhered to current guidelines (control group). Training was progressively increased to 60 min under continuous ECG monitoring. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) was measured at regular intervals. Ambulatory ECG monitoring was performed before and after 6 wkof training and left ventricular function was evaluated by echocardiography in the ischemic group after at least 6 wk of training.
 
 Results: The ischemic training sessions were very well tolerated. The ischemic group had myocardial ischemia during the first 20, 40, and 60 min exercise sessions for 12.3 ± 6.8 min, 29.0 ± 12.9 min and 49.8 ± 2.2 min, respectively, with ST-segment depression ranging from 1.0 to 2.1 mm. The estimated myocardial work (as expressed by RPP) during the training session was also higher in the ischemic than in the control group for the first 20 min (17 354 ± 6 528 vs 13 355 ± 2 936 beats/min • mmHg, respectively; P=0.08), 40 min (16 329 ± 5 407 vs 12 452 ± 2 330 beats/min • mmHg, respectively; P=0.04), and 60 min training sessions (18 750 ± 5 698 vs 13 352 ± 2 947 beats/min • mmHg, respectively; P=0.02) No patient in either group demonstrated significant arrhythmias nor increased cTnT. The measured cTnT stayed below the detectable values of the essay (>0.01μg/l) for all patients at all times. Left ventricular function remained unchanged in the ischemic group.
 
 Conclusion: In patients with IHD, prolonged and repeated ischemic training sessions up to 60 min can be well tolerated without evidence of myocardial injury, significant arrhythmias or left ventricular dysfunction. Thus exercising at or above the ischemic threshold does not appear deleterious under this kind of supervision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207