Pre- and Post-Parturition Personality Factors In "Keep" versus "Give" Unwed Mothers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unwed mothers who decide to place their child for adoption were compared, both pre- and post-parturition, with those who chose to keep their child. Dependent variables included locus of control, assertiveness, and self-concept, measured respectively by the James I-E scale, 16PF scales E, H & Q2, and Bill's Index of Adjustment and Values. It was found that in general, there are few differences between these two groups, but with a significant improvement in self-esteem by both groups post-parturition. The women who decide to keep their child have a high ideal self-concept following the birth, and are more conforming and conservative than the women who surrender their child. Les filles-meres qui ont decide de faire adopter leur enfant sont comparees a celles qui ont decide de garder leur enfant. Cette comparaison se fait en deux etapes: avant et apres la naissance de l'enfant. Les variables dependantes a l'etude etaient les suivantes: le foyer de controle, l'assurance et le concept de soi. L'echelle James I-E, les echelles E, Het Q2 du 16PF et l'Index d'ajustement et de valeur de Bill ont servi a mesurer ces variables. En general, peu de differences distinguent ces deux groupes. Cependant, on a note chez les deux groupes, apres avoir donne naissance, une amelioration significative dans le degre derespect de soi. Apres avoir donne naissance, les femmes qui gardent leur enfant ont un concept de soi qui incarne un ideal noble. De plus, elles se montrent plus conformistes et conservatrices que ;es femmes qui placent leur enfant en adoption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".