La localisation des services aux entreprises dans la métropole lyonnaise : entre centralité et diffusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Cet article traite de l’évolution des localisations des établissements de services aux entreprises dans la métropole lyonnaise à partir de données de l’INSEE et d’une enquête. Il apparaît que les implantations périphériques connaissent un développement significatif qui résulte de créations plutôt que de transferts depuis le centre. Cette dynamique s’appuie largement sur la configuration des axes de transport et la périphérisation des clients. Le centre métropolitain conserve cependant une très forte attractivité, du fait de la présence d’atouts spécifiques comme un fort potentiel de clientèle, la présence du TGV et le prestige associé à l’adresse. Les stratégies de localisation diffèrent toutefois notablement entre les catégories de services aux entreprises, et participent au maintien de disparités de type centre-périphérie mais également est-ouest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".