MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W167353944

В смертельном пике информационной войны

2014· article· ru· W167353944 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Александр Владимирович Токаренко, Дмитрий Викторович Суржик

Bibliographic record

VenueПространство и Время · 2014
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSecurity, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpposition (politics)PoliticsPolitical scienceUkrainianLawDemocracyCivil societyEconomic historySociologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

article dwells to the analysis of the so-called “color revolutions” at the Middle East, Balkans and CIS at the 21st century first years. We tried to find objective reasons of these revolts and to examine the scope of the mass actions of civil disobedience that overthrew legal governments of Egypt, Serbia, Republic of Georgia and Ukraine. As a result of such analysis, we conclude all these actions were inspired and prepared aboard and were committed in the interests of these foreign sponsors or some domestic oligarchs. So, in such a way, these actions were not revolutions, but coups d'etat. They became possible due to white and black PR-tools (in politics, religion and education) used by Ukrainian anti-Yanukovich political opposition for years. This PR-campaign had some stages. It started as the opposition to the crimes of government, than became a cultural manifestation against ‘the brutal Russia’ and finished as a neo-Nazi upheaval and mass murdering of all Russians and any suspected in his own mentions. These tools of Operations through masses to the streets and prepared them to make violence against the security forces, and then, when these politicians have got a power, they started a civil war at Donbass. IW/IO; information warfare; information operations; ‘color revolutions’; Ukraine; political crises; PSYOP; propaganda; Euro-Maidan 14/88. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., n.d. Web. . (In Russian). Baskerville R. Third-Degree Conflicts: Warfare. European Journal of Systems 19.1 (2010): 1–4. Bremmer I. Democracy in Cyberspace: What Technology Can and Cannot Do. Foreign Affairs 89.6 (2010): 86–92. Brzezinski Z. One More Chance. Three Presidents and US Superpower Crisis. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya Publisher, 2007. (In Russian). Chong A. Information Warfare? Case for an Asian Perspective on Armed Forces & Society (2013): 0095327X13483444. Constitution of Ukraine. Law no. 254k/96 BP dated 28 Jun.1996, Document 254k/96 BP, Current Edition. Official Website of the Supreme Rada of Ukraine. Supreme Rada of Ukraine, n.d. Web. . (In Ukrainian). Dyukov А.R., ed. Daily Terror. Actions of Nationalist Organizations at Western Regions of the USSR. Volume 1: Western Ukraine, February – June, 1945. Moscow: Foundation “Istoricheskaya Pamyat” Publisher, 2009. (In Russian). Faggard D. Swarming: Asymmetric Effects on Public Discourse in Future Military Review 93.2 (2013): 79–88. Gapich A., Lushnikov D. Technologies of ‘Coloured Revolutions’. Moscow: RIOR Publisher, (In Russian). Komleva N.A. Arab Spring as a Technological Structure Element of the Dominance. Space and Time 1 (2012): 18–23. (In Russian). Komleva N.A., Simons G., Strovsky D.L. Internet as Netwar Source. POLITEX: Political Expertize 2 (2010): 58–67. Web. . (In Russian). Kovalevych B.V. Networks as Band Instrument of Warfare in the Modern Facets: Scientific-Theoretical and Socio-Political Almanac 4 (2014): 118–121. (In Ukrainian). Krivosheev G.F., ed. Russia and USSR at Wars, 20th Century. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS Publisher, 2001. (In Russian). Kul'chits'ky S.V., Lebedeva Yu.G. Textbook for Secondary Schools on History of Ukraine for 10th Class. Kyiv: Geneza Publisher, (In Ukrainian). Lenin V. I. The Collapse of 2nd Communist International. Complete Writings. Moscow: Politizdat Publisher, 1969, volume 26. (In Russian). Manoylo А.М. Information-psychological War: Determinant Factors of Modern Military Conflict. PSY-FACTOR. N.p., 2005. Web. . (In Russian). National Intelligence Council. Global Trends 2010. Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Leading Intelligence Integration. Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, Nov. 1997. Web. 20 June 2007. . National Intelligence Council. Trends 2015: A Dialogue about the Future with Nongovernment Experts. National Foreign Intelligence Board under the Authority of the Director of Central Intelligence, Dec. 2000. PDF-file. , p. 70. Parks R.C., Duggan D.P. Principles of Cyberwarfare. IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine 9.5 (2011): 30–35. Pocheptsov G. Revolution.com: Foundations of Revolt Engineering. Moscow: Evropa Publisher, 2005. (In Russian). Polishchuk V. Bitter Truth. OUN-UIA Crimes. Donetsk: Toronto Publisher, 1995. (In Russian). Polyakova A. From the Provinces to the Parliament: How the Ukrainian Radical Right Mobilized in Galicia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (2014): 211–25. Pometun E I., Gupan N.N. History of Ukraine. 11th Class. Textbook for Secondary Schools. Kiev: Osvita Publisher, 2012. (In Russian). Ponomareva E.G. Secrets of ‘Coloured Revolutions’. Modern Technologies of Political Regimes Overthrow. Free Thought 1/2 (2012): 87-98. Web. . (In Russian). Porche I.R. III, Paul C., York M., Serena C.C., Sollinger J.M., Axelband E., Min E.Y., Held B.J. Redefining Warfare Boundaries for an Army in a Wireless World. Rand Corporation, 2013. PDF-file. . Rhodes C.L. Three Revolutions: A Comparative Study of Democratization and Youth Movements in the Post-Soviet Sphere. Diss. University of Louisville, 2011. PDF-file. . Saveliev E.P. Old History of Cossaks. Moscow: Veche Publisher, (In Russian). Skrynnikov R.G. Social and Political Struggle at Russian State, Beginning of 17th Century. Moscow: Nauka Publisher, 1985. (In Russian). Smoliy V.A., Stepankov V.S. History of Ukraine. 7th Class. Textbook for Secondary Schools. Kiev: Geneza Publisher, 2007. (In Russian). Sun Tzu. Art of War. Moscow: AST Publisher, 2003. (In Russian). Szostek J. The Media Battles of Ukraine’s EuroMaidan. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 11 (2014): 1-19. The US Joint Chiefs of Staff. JP 3-13. Operations. 27 Nov. 2012. PDf-file. . The US Joint Chiefs of Staff. JP 3-13. Operations. 9 Oct. 1998. PDF-file. . The US Joint Chiefs of Staff. JP 3-53 Doctrine for Joint Psychological Operations. 5 Sept. 2003. PDF-file. . The USC Center on Public Diplomacy Overview. University Of Southern California Annenberg School For Communication. July & Aug. 2014. PDF-file. . Thomas T.L. Is IW Paradigm Outdated? A Discussion of U.S. IW Theory. Journal of Warfare 2,3 (2003): 109–116. Ukrainian Nationalist Organizations at WWII. Documents. Volume 2: 1944–1945. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publisher, 2012. (In Russian). Vlasov V.S. History of Ukraine. 8th Class. Textbook for Secondary Schools. Kiev: Geneza Publisher, 2008. (In Russian). Tokarenko, A. V., and D. V. Surzhik. At the IW/IO Deadly Nosedive. Space and Time 3 (2014): 34–44. Fixed network address 2226-7271provr_st3-17.2014.13.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueПространство и ВремяSame topicSecurity, Politics, and Digital TransformationFrench-language works237,207