MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 19842: Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: No Sex Disparity

2014· article· en· W1673560730 on OpenAlexaffabout
Annie Chou, Graham C. Wong, Min Gao, Julie Park, Carolyn Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsProvidence Health CareVancouver General HospitalSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyCardiogenic shockUnivariate analysisTIMIPopulationHeart failureOdds ratioST elevationMultivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Microvascular dysfunction is highly prevalent in women and presumed secondary to hormonal fluctuations, increased vascular tone, and endothelial dysfunction. Its contribution has never been examined in the acute setting. Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with persistent ST-elevation (ST-E) post successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) are at risk of in-hospital cardiac events. We used ST-E recovery on ECGs pre and post PPCI to study potential sex differences in microvascular dysfunction, in conjunction with cardiac events in a STEMI population. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive STEMI patients undergoing PPCI in Vancouver between May 2007 and September 2010 with evaluable ECGs pre and post PPCI. Patients with bundle branch block were excluded. Quantification of ST-E in each lead was done by electronic calipers by investigators blinded to clinical outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed by sex, for the association between ST-E recovery in the lead with maximal ST-E and the composite of in-hospital mortality, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and reinfarction. Results: Of our 413 patients, 23% were women. In comparing baseline characteristics, age was significantly different (mean age of females = 72 vs. males = 61, p<0.001). More female than male patients had incomplete (<50%) ST-E recovery (20.6% vs. 12.7%, p=0.052). Women with incomplete recovery had an odds ratio of 2.3 for the primary outcome, compared with 1.4 in men, which was not statistically significant between sex. The primary outcome occurred more often in women (29.9% vs. 18.0%, p=0.012), but after adjusting for age, sex difference was no longer significant. Conclusions: Female STEMI patients are older, had more incomplete ST-E recovery after PPCI and had more in-hospital cardiac events, although significance was lost after adjusting for age. The higher prevalence of microvascular dysfunction in stable women may not be a large contributor of persistent ST-E in the acute setting. The higher incidence of incomplete ST-elevation in women may be attributable to the increasing prevalence of endothelial dysfunction with age. This novel interaction should be further examined with objective measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research→French-language works237,207→