MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Topics on HIV/AIDS for Inclusion Into a Physical Therapy Curriculum: Consensus Through a Modified Delphi Technique

2012· article· en· W167459757 on OpenAlex
Hellen Myezwa, Aimee Stewart, Piet Becker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Therapy Education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)MedicineCurriculumDelphi methodFamily medicineDelphiPhysical therapyPsychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. An understanding of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) has become increasingly important for physical therapists due to the changing nature of the morbidity and mortality patterns of the syndrome. The involvement of physical therapists in management, treatment, and care for people with HIV/AIDS is growing, and with this involvement the need to educate both pre- and post-graduate physical therapists also is growing. Subjects/Methods. This study determined the level of consensus among academic staff at 8 South African universities with regard to the curriculum topics related to HIV/AIDS. The list of themes and topics considered core to understanding HIV in physical therapy and deemed necessary for inclusion in a mainstreamed curriculum was developed from the results of 3 preceding studies and incorporated into a questionnaire. Sixty-eight faculty members from physical therapy schools in South Africa were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process using e-mail as the method of contact. Consensus was set at 80%. Results. The final sample used in the study was 58, 10 being excluded from the sample due to unavailability. Forty-seven faculty members responded to the first round of the Delphi study, giving a response rate of 81%. A response rate of 91% was attained in the second round with 43 of the 47 respondents from the first round answering. Consensus was obtained in the first round for all topics except hematology and anemia, lipodystrophy (abnormal distribution of the body's adipose tissue), and the relation of anemia and lipodystrophy to physical therapy. These 3 topics obtained consensus in the second round. Discussion and Conclusion. The level of consensus was considered to be high, as the majority of topics attained at least 90% consensus after 2 rounds. The comprehensive list of topics that had consensus and emerged out of this study represents a solid starting point for the inclusion of HIV into physical therapy curricula in a mainstreamed manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it