MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1675866582

Space-Based Constraints on North American Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides

2005· article· en· W1675866582 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. Chance, Randall V. Martin, Christopher E. Sioris

Bibliographic record

VenueAGUSM · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSCIAMACHYNOxEmission inventoryEnvironmental scienceFossil fuelAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyAir quality indexCombustionTroposphereGeographyWaste managementEngineeringGeologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global emission inventories of nitrogen oxides (NOx) remain uncertain to a factor of 2 with substantial implications for understanding of surface air quality, atmospheric oxidation, and climate. We will discuss recent progress in improving NOx emission inventories by combining traditional bottom-up inventories with top-down constraints from the GOME and SCIAMACHY satellite instruments. This integration results in an optimized surface NOx emission inventory with lower uncertainties. Additionally, comparisons with in-situ NO2 profile measurements during the ICARTT campaign (summer 2004) establish the validity and quantify the accuracy of the SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO2 column abundances. Conclusions •Growing confidence in top-down constraint on NOx emissions •Gross-underestimate in NOx emissions from megacities •Soil NOx emissions underestimated, especially from Northern Equatorial Africa (not shown here – ask me) •North American lightning NOx emissions underestimated (not shown here – ask me) Acknowledgements This research is supported by NASA, the Smithsonian Institution, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Trust (NSRIT). The Cooperation of ESA and the DLR in the GOME and SCIAMACHY programs is greatly appreciated. 1. Current Inventory Status: Global surface NOx emissions are uncertain by a factor of 2, with substantial implications for atmospheric pollution Here in Tg N yr-1 (source) Fossil Fuel 24 (GEIA) Biomass Burning 6 (Duncan et al., 2003) Soils 5 (Yienger and Levy, 1995) Uncertainty Range Fossil Fuel (20-33) Biomass Burning (3-13) Soils (4-21) 2005 Spring 2. Satellites Provide Top-Down Measurements 3. Global Distribution of Tropospheric NO2 from SCIAMACHY 4. Use Retrieved NO2 Columns to Map NOx Emissions 7. Global Top-Down Emission Inventory Reveals Major Discrepancy in NOx Emissions from Megacities Nadir measurements in the UV and visible provide measurements of tropospheric NO2, O3 (see A21A-13), HCHO (see A11A-06), and SO2 Used Here GOME (1995-2002) • Spatial resolution 320×40 km2 • Global coverage in 3 days SCIAMACHY (2002-present) • Spatial resolution 60×30 km2 • Global coverage in 6 days Not Yet OMI (2004) GOME-2 a,b,c (2006+) OMPS-n (2006+) NO NO2 Boundary Layer NO / NO2 vs. altitude

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAGUSM→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→