Isuma: Inuit Video Art by Michael Robert Evans, and: The Fast Runner: Filming the Legend of Atanarjuat by Michael Robert Evans (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isuma: Video Art. By Michael Robert Evans. (Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2008. Pp. xi + 209, glossary, notes, references, index.)The Fast Runner: Filming the Legend of Atanarjuat. By Michael Robert Evans. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2010. Pp. ix + 126, glossary, notes, bibliography, index, photographs.)In his well-argued 1991 book, In the Absence of the Sacred: The Failure of Technology & the Survival of the Indian Nations (Sierra Club), Jerry Mander made the claim that television, like all technology, not neutral. In fact, he reasoned, it works against the cultural lives of land-based native populations. While it matters who controls the content of film and television, Mander stressed the intoxicating danger of the form that can easily replace other ways of gaining knowledge, such as through oral storytelling. In his two comprehensive books, Isuma: Video Art and The Fast Runner: Filming the Legend of Atanarjuat, Michael Robert Evans demonstrates how a group of determined filmmakers have addressed this kind of criticism by not only controlling the content of the work, but also by making filmmaking a part of the Igloolik folkloric process.The author acknowledges that his two books share some of the same information. This repetition reasonable, given that Isuma's most widely recognized accomplishment the 2001 film, Atanarjuat, the Fast Runner, which also one of the most noteworthy Native films ever made. Perhaps in part because of the Isuma filmmakers' different approach to filmmaking and presenting a story, this film captured the attention of critics all over the world. It won the Camera d'Or Award at the Cannes Film Festival, along with numerous other honors, including six Genies (Canada's version of the Oscars) and the Best Film Award at the Image NATIVE Media Arts Festival. It was the first feature-length film (172 minutes) completely created by filmmakers. Isuma Productions was responsible for writing, directing, and producing the film, almost all of the actors were nonprofessionals, and all the actors were from the Igloolik area. Additionally, the entire film in Inuktitut, Canada's language, and the story carried out in both the human world and the spirit world.Isuma: Video Art full of praise for the core filmmakers, Zacharias Kunuk, Norman Cohn, Pauloosie Qulitalik, and Paul Apak. Evans describes the many films and videos Isuma has made, making the point that Inuit videography should take its place among the great arts (p. 3). His position that filmmaking in this context not to be contrasted to high art and that technology should not be seen as invading or destroying the Inuit's traditional culture. Instead, videography is less because it created with electronic machinery, and it no less art because it shown on television (p. 7). Claiming that video more than visual narrative, the filmmakers make a convincing argument that video built just as houses and ceramic jugs are built. Therefore, it can be read in a similar manner to sculpture. Evans also describes the many Isuma projects that present everyday folkloric practices such as hunting, caribou-skinning, fishing, hairstyling, making igloos, creating skin tents and fish traps, and tending to the qulliq (the traditional stone lamp).In his second book, The Fast Runner: Filming the Legend of Atanarjuat, Evans explains the importance of the film, Atanarjuat, the Fast Runner, and the many ways in which it rooted in Igloolik culture. Folklorists, anthropologists, educators, filmmakers, and others will be interested in the manner in which this film challenges ubiquitous Eurocentric approaches to making and thinking about film. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".