MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1676574730

Ongoing Neotectonic Activity in the Timiskaming ─ Kipawa Area of Ontario and Québec

2010· article· en· W1676574730 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michael Doughty, Nick Eyles, Louise Daurio

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGrabenHorstHorst and grabenHalf-grabenGeomorphologyFault scarpNeotectonicsPaleontologyGlacial periodCenozoicFault (geology)Structural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Timiskaming Graben lies along the border of Ontario and Quebec within the Western Quebec Seismic Zone – a conspicuous belt of heightened intracratonic seismic activity in eastern Canada. The graben forms a prominent 50-km wide fault-bounded morphotectonic depression partly filled by Lake Timiskaming (ca. 100 km long and 200 m maximum depth). This lake is a postglacial successor to the much larger glacial Lake Barlow, which drained about 8000 years ago, leaving an extensive clay plain (Little Clay plain). Some 1000 kilometres of high resolution seismic sub-bottom data collected from Lake Timiskaming reveal that both late-glacial Barlow and postglacial Holocene sediments are extensively deformed by neotectonic horst and graben structures. The bathymetry of the lake floor is structurally controlled by faulting; graben basins record enhanced postglacial subsidence between parallel bounding faults, one of which is expressed onshore on the surrounding clay plain as a 20-km long, 10-m high scarp. These structures indicate ongoing neotectonic activity on a scale not recognized elsewhere across intracratonic North America. Seismic reflection data confirm the Timiskaming Graben as an intraplate ‘weak zone’ that may contain a long, late Cenozoic sediment record. A program of deep continental drilling within the Timiskaming Graben and extension of the current program of investigating lake-floor geology across the many lakes of the Western Quebec Seismic Zone are now needed. SOMMAIRE Le graben de Temiscamingue est situe le long de la frontiere entre le Quebec et l’Ontario, au sein de la Zone sismique de l’Ouest du Quebec – une zone notable de plus grande activite sismique intracratonique de l’est du Canada. Le graben forme une depression morphotectonique de 50 km de largeur delimitee par des failles, partiellement remplie par le lac Temiscaminque (environ 100 km de long et une profondeur maximale de 200 m). Ce lac est le successeur postglaciaire du lac Barlow, bien plus grand, qui s’est draine il y a 8 000 ans environ, exposant une grande plaine alluvionnaire argileuse (plaine de Little Clay). Quelques 1 000 km de donnees sismiques haute resolution des couches proximales du fond du lac Temiscamingue montrent que tant les sediments holocenes de la fin du lac glaciaire Barlow que les sediments postglaciaires sont considerablement deformes par des structures neotectonique de horst et graben. La bathymetrie du plancher du lac est structurellement determinee par la formation de failles; les bassins de graben ont enregistre un accroissement de la subsidence postglaciaire entre les failles bordieres, et l’une d’elle se manifeste par un escarpement exonde de 10 m de hauteur sur 20 km de longueur qui surplombe la plaine alluvionnaire environ-nante. Ces elements structuraux sont l’indication d’une activite neotectonique persistante, a une echelle qui n’existe nulle part ailleurs dans le craton nord-americain. Les donnees de sismique reflexion confirme que le graben de Temiscamingue est une zone de « faiblesse » intraplaque qui pourrait renfermer un registre sedimentaire Cenozoique etendu. Il faut maintenant lancer un programme de sondages continentaux profonds a travers le graben de Temiscamingue et prolonger l’actuel programme d’etude geologique des fonds des lacs de la Zone sismique de l’Ouest du Quebec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207