Effects of single compared with pair housing on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity and low-dose heroin place conditioning in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whether social isolation of adult rats under standard laboratory conditions produces significant long-term alterations in behavior and physiology is unclear. In the present study, male Sprague-Dawley rats were singly or paired-housed for 10 wk. During this period, they were tested for acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition of heroin (0.3 mg/kg)-conditioned place preference. Fecal corticoid metabolite levels were analyzed several times throughout the period of housing, and food consumption and body weight were monitored. During place conditioning, heroin induced a significant increase in locomotor activity in both singly and pair housed rats, and the resulting place preference was similar in both groups. However, singly housed rats showed increased motor reactivity to heroin on reconditioning after extinction and displayed significant reacquisition of conditioned place preference, compared with pair-housed animals. Over the 10-wk period of the study, there were no differences in body weight or food consumption between groups. Mild significant increases in relative adrenal gland weight and decreases in relative brain weight were noted in singly housed animals compared with those paired. Significant decreases in nocturnal fecal corticoid metabolite output were noted in both groups, with loss of circadian variation in fecal corticoid levels over the course of the study. These data suggest that male Sprague-Dawley rats, irrespective of single or pair housing, develop reduced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity over time under standard laboratory housing conditions. Single housing can enhance both this effect and sensitivity to the stimulatory and rewarding actions of heroin after withdrawal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".