Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since its inception as marketing idea in the 1970s, the has been constructed as feminized domestic space, an elision ratified by phrases such as mom and minivan mom. The marketing of the since 1983 represents, in material form, the successful realization of Ronald Reagan's pro-life, anti-ERA policy of the 1980s by physically putting women into little boxes that bundled family values— imperatives of heteronormativity, hyperfecundity, and domestic suburban life. A postfeminist reading of the as material object enables us to consider how car design and manufacturing have delimited women's access to public space and independent activity. The current liberation rhetoric of SUVs reveals the degree to which women in late-capitalist society have allowed ease of handling, driver visibility and a sense of adventure, to displace bitchy political activism, vision, and outrage. Resume Depuis son elaboration en tant que marchandise dans les annees 1970, la camionnette est construite comme un espace domestique au feminin, une reduction consacree par des expressions telles « maman soccer » et « maman camionnette ». Le marketing des camionnettes depuis 1983 represente concretement la realisation des politiques pro-vie et antiamendement sur l'egalite des droits de l'ere Reagan aux Etats-Unis, parce qu'il cloitre les femmes dans de petites boites renfermant valeurs familiales, imperatifs d'heteronormalite, hyperfecondite et vie domestique en banlieue. Une lecture postfeministe des camionnettes en tant qu 'objets materiels permet de voir comment la conception et la fabrication des voitures ont delimite l'acces des femmes aux espaces publics et aux activites independantes. La rhetorique de liberation par les vehicules loisir et travail revele quel point les femmes de la societe du capitalisme avance ont permis la « maniabilite », la « visibilite » et au « sens de l'aventure » d'evincer l'activisme politique confiant, le regard penetrant et l'indignation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".