MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Legislative Assurance System for Sustainable Development of Chinese Medium and Small Enterprises' (SMEs) ETUDE DE LA POTILITIQUE DE LOI POUR LA PROTECTION DU DEVELOPPMENT CONTINU DES PME EN CHINE

2012· article· fr· W1680595866 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceBusinessWelfare economicsHumanitiesEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current legislative assurance system for protecting Chinese Medium and Small Enterprises’ (SMEs) is not complete. Encourages and preferential terms in the legal system are ambiguous which are not suffi cient to be used in promoting sustainable development of Medium and Small Enterprises (SMEs) in practice. This paper gives fi ve related proposes by analyzing problems of sustainable development of Chinese Medium and Small Enterprises (SMEs): Scientific management and governance of Medium and Small Enterprises (SMEs); Standardize government authority’s responsibilities legally; Construct perfect and complete market service system; Provide legal protection for Medium and Small Enterprises (SMEs) fi nancing; and Provide preferential tax with SMEs. Key words : Medium and Small Enterprises (SMEs); Corporation governance structure; Financing; Tax preference Resume Dans la Chine de nos jours, sa politique de loi pour la protection du developpement continu des PME n’est pas encore complexe. Les accords d’encouragement et des avantages sont encore tres traditionnelles, et ne peuvent pas etre reellement introduire dans la partie de developpement continue des PME. La presente etude reflete les problemes du developpement continue des entreprises de PME, et propose 5 conseils d’amelioration: La structure du traitement de la science des PME, Specification des fonctions des organismes gouvernemetale conformement a la loi, Mettre en place des systemes de services du marche, Fournir des protections de reformes de loi pour la combinaison des capitaux des entreprises de taille moyenne-petite et les protection de reformes de la loi pour la fiscalite des entreprises de taille moyenne-petite. Mots cles : PME; Structure de traitement; Financement; Avantage de la fi scalite

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it