Bibliographic record
Abstract
ARCLines Opening the Video InnIn the early 1970s, the artist Michael Goldberg arrived in Vancouver, and began working with the artists, writers, dancers and cultural producers involved in Intermedia.In 1971, influenced by the activity of the Eternal Network (an international group of artists who exchanged correspondence through the postal system) and in collaboration with Image Bank (affiliated with Intermedia, and part of the Eternal Network) Goldberg produced the first International Video Exchange Directory.The Directory was published after Goldberg and Image Bank sent 1000 postcards around the world calling for groups and individuals working with or interested in video to form a network to facilitate the free exchange of non commercial videotape. Allison CollinsIn 1973 a group of about a dozen artists interested in video came together at the Matrix Video Conference, held at the Vancouver Art Gallery, amid a gathering of over 160 international videomakers in Vancouver.Co-organized by Michael Goldberg and Trish Hardman, the conference admission involved depositing a videotape and filling out a Video Exchange Directory card.Shawn Preus and Paul Wong were recruited to work on Matrix, and much of the their time was spent dubbing copies of tapes for individuals at the conference.The result of their efforts became the base of a new video collection of approximately 80 tapes.The Satellite Video Exchange Society was founded shortly after the conference (incorporated in 1973), and the group decided to open a new video resource space where they could make the tape collection gathered at Matrix into a publicly accessible video library.The space later became known as the Video Inn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.514 | 0.185 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".